AI Impact on Employment and Living Wage Policy in Australia - A Comprehensive Analysis (2024-2029)

Written By Chris Farquhar

Introduction

With the advent of AI and its transformative impact on the labour market, the need for policies that ensure equitable income distribution and economic resilience has never been greater. AI-driven automation presents both challenges and opportunities, reshaping industries and workforce dynamics. This document examines the implications of AI-driven job displacement and explores the role of a dynamic living wage framework in mitigating social and economic risks. By analysing Australia's employment landscape, projected industry impacts, and international case studies, we propose solutions tailored to the nation's unique socio-economic context.

1. Current Employment Landscape

Baseline Data (February 2024)

Based on ABS Labour Force Data:

  • Total employed persons: 14.2 million

  • Current unemployment rate: 3.7%

  • Total unemployed persons: ~548,000

Industry Employment Distribution

According to ABS Detailed Labour Force Data:

  • Financial Services: 488,000

  • Retail Trade: 1,287,000

  • Manufacturing: 917,000

  • Transport, Postal and Warehousing: 733,000

  • Healthcare and Social Assistance: 2,048,000

  • Education and Training: 1,158,000

  • Professional Services: 1,442,000

Understanding these figures is critical for assessing the potential impact of automation across sectors and establishing a baseline for policy interventions.

2. Projected AI Impact by Industry (2024-2029)

Industry-Specific Analysis

  • Financial Services and Insurance:

    • Base employment: 488,000

    • Automation impact: 12-15%

    • Job displacement: 58,560 - 73,200

  • Retail Trade:

    • Base employment: 1,287,000

    • Automation impact: 18-22%

    • Job displacement: 231,660 - 283,140

  • Manufacturing:

    • Base employment: 917,000

    • Automation impact: 15-20%

    • Job displacement: 137,550 - 183,400

  • Healthcare:

    • Base employment: 2,048,000

    • Automation impact: 5-8%

    • Job displacement: 102,400 - 163,840

Key Insight: While automation is expected to displace a significant number of jobs, it also creates opportunities for upskilling and the emergence of new roles. For example, advanced manufacturing and AI-integrated healthcare require specialised skill sets, which underscores the importance of targeted retraining initiatives.

3. Living Wage Context and Challenges

Current Living Wage Benchmarks

Based on Living Wage Australia (2024):

  • Hourly rate: $25.61

  • Weekly rate: $973.18

  • Annual rate: $50,605

International Case Studies

  • Nordic Model (Denmark, Sweden):

    • Flexible security approach combining robust social safety nets with active labour market policies.

    • High unionisation rates facilitate industry-wide agreements, ensuring fair wages and working conditions.

    • Comprehensive retraining programs funded by both governments and employers support transitions to new jobs.

  • Singapore's SkillsFuture:

    • A national initiative providing individual training accounts to citizens, with credits allocated for career development.

    • Industry transformation maps identify future skills requirements and guide workforce upskilling efforts.

    • AI-driven skills matching platforms help align job seekers with market demand, while wage support schemes incentivise employers to hire and train workers.

  • Germany's Industry 4.0:

    • Dual vocational training combines theoretical education with practical industry experience, ensuring a skilled workforce.

    • Regional competence centres act as hubs for innovation and skills development, particularly in manufacturing and automation.

    • The "Work 4.0" framework promotes collaborative stakeholder engagement, balancing technological adoption with worker protections.

  • Canada's Future Skills Initiative:

    • Focuses on public-private partnerships to address skills gaps and promote lifelong learning.

    • Emphasises data-driven decision-making through national skills assessments and forecasting tools.

    • Financial support programs target marginalised communities to ensure equitable access to training opportunities.

Key Challenge: Translating these international models into the Australian context requires balancing federal-state coordination and addressing regional disparities in living costs.

4. Policy Framework and Implementation

Proposed Dynamic Living Wage Structure

  • Base Living Wage: Indexed to cost of living.

  • Regional Adjustment Factors: Reflecting housing and utility costs.

  • Industry-Specific Supplements: Addressing unique sectoral needs.

  • Skills Transition Premium: Incentivising upskilling and career transitions.

Support Mechanisms

  • Financial: Wage insurance, relocation assistance, and extended retraining benefits.

  • Skills Development: Subsidised technical training and career transition counselling.

  • Regional Considerations: Differentiated approaches for metropolitan and regional areas to enhance inclusivity.

5. Alternatives to Living Wage: Market-Driven Solutions

Key Initiatives

  • AI Transition Insurance: Private insurance products covering displacement and retraining costs.

  • Corporate Skills Bonds: Bonds issued to fund retraining with returns linked to job placement success.

  • Industry-Led Training Partnerships: Collaboration between tech companies and traditional industries.

Evaluation

Market-driven approaches complement public initiatives by reducing the fiscal burden on governments while fostering private-sector innovation. However, challenges such as equitable access and quality assurance must be addressed.

Conclusion

In light of the projected impact of AI on Australia's workforce, implementing a robust living wage policy is both a moral imperative and an economic necessity. While challenges remain in designing and deploying such frameworks, the potential for long-term benefits—ranging from reduced income inequality to enhanced economic resilience—justifies immediate action. By leveraging a blend of public and private initiatives, Australia can position itself as a leader in inclusive economic growth in the age of AI. The next steps include stakeholder consultations, pilot program launches, and ongoing evaluation to refine the policy framework.

References

  • ABS Labour Force Australia (2024)

  • Fair Work Commission Annual Wage Review (2024)

  • Productivity Commission Reports (2023-24)

  • Australian Computer Society Digital Pulse (2023)

  • OECD Employment Outlook (2023)

  • World Economic Forum Future of Jobs Report (2023)

  • McKinsey Global Institute AI Impact Study (2023)

  • Centre for Future Work Studies (2024)

  • Digital Economy Research Network Papers (2024)

Chris Farquhar
Next

AI Impact on Australian Employment (2024-2029)